Recent developments from Washington suggest that U.S. President Joe Biden may be nearing a decision to provide Ukraine with the essential longer-range missiles it urgently requires. A report from CNN on September 11, quoting an official familiar with the discussions, revealed that the final verdict on supplying Ukraine with Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) had yet to be made. However, there is growing optimism within the administration that such a decision is increasingly likely as Ukraine's counteroffensive continues to face formidable Russian defensive lines.
The potential delivery of ATACMS would mark a significant escalation in US military assistance to Ukraine, providing Kyiv with the ability to strike targets up to 300 kilometers (186 miles) behind Russian lines — including the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014 and has used as a staging ground for attacks on southern Ukraine.
Ukraine's ongoing spring and summer counteroffensive has highlighted the pressing need for enhanced weaponry. Specifically, Ukraine seeks missiles capable of striking deep within Russian-controlled territory, enabling Kyiv to target Russian field headquarters, ammunition depots, logistics hubs, and command centers effectively. This request for extended-range missile systems is part of a broader list of desired weapons and equipment, as outlined by Oleksiy Danilov, the secretary of Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council.
The comprehensive list includes ammunition, artillery shells of various calibers, cruise missiles, multifunctional aircraft, helicopters, drones, and sophisticated robotic de-mining equipment. Ukraine is also urging its allies to establish maintenance and repair facilities for Western weapons in bordering countries to ensure that damaged equipment can be quickly returned to service.
"We have proven that we can use Western weapons effectively," Danilov said. "Now we need the tools to finish the job. Every day of delay costs Ukrainian lives."
While the U.S. supplied guided multiple-launch rocket systems (HIMARS) and GMLRS missiles with a 70-kilometer range during the summer of 2022 for attacks on Russian logistical facilities, ATACMS presents a more formidable option. These missiles, launched from the same High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) that Ukraine already operates, boast a range of up to 300 kilometers. Such capabilities could significantly challenge Russia's defense lines in the south, a crucial factor as Ukrainian forces push toward the Sea of Azov, 100 kilometers away.
Initial U.S. reluctance to supply longer-range missile systems stemmed from concerns about their potential use to strike deep into Russian territory, potentially leading to escalation with Moscow. However, Ukraine's demonstrated ability to use homegrown drones for attacks within Russia — including strikes on Moscow's financial district — suggests an awareness of these concerns and a willingness to accept risk. Moreover, Ukraine already possesses some longer-range missile systems, including UK-supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles used in a recent attack on the Russian Black Sea Fleet facilities at Sevastopol, which resulted in severe damage to two vessels.
Russian officials have warned that supplying ATACMS would be a "red line" that could lead to a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia. But similar warnings about tanks, long-range artillery, and F-16 fighters have not deterred Western allies, and many analysts believe the threat of escalation is overstated.
President Biden's decision to reverse the U.S. stance on allowing NATO allies to supply Ukraine with F-16 fighter jets underscores a growing recognition within the U.S. and NATO of the necessity to bolster Ukraine's arsenal for a more effective 2023 counteroffensive. The pattern is consistent: Ukraine requests a weapon system; the US initially says no due to escalation concerns; months later, the weapon is approved. That pattern suggests ATACMS will eventually be delivered — the question is timing.
Germany is also contemplating supplying Ukraine with Taurus cruise missiles, capable of autonomously approaching their targets and boasting a range of up to 500 kilometers. However, concerns over range and escalation are influencing deliberations, with possible modifications to limit the missile's reach under consideration. The Taurus is considered even more capable than the British Storm Shadow, with advanced terrain-mapping guidance that makes it resistant to jamming.
Germany's Chancellor Olaf Scholz has been more cautious than other Western leaders, expressing concern that Taurus missiles could be used to strike Moscow. However, German public opinion and parliamentary pressure are mounting for delivery. A compromise may involve providing missiles with reduced range or imposing strict targeting restrictions.
Since Russia's invasion in February 2022, Ukraine's need for increasingly sophisticated weapons systems has continued to evolve. Quoting Article 51 of the UN Charter in an August article, Oleksiy Danilov emphasized that aiding Ukraine in its defense is squarely in the self-interest of UN members. Danilov outlined how Ukraine's requirements have shifted from its initial desperate defense against the superior artillery of Russia's invasion force to its present needs as Ukrainian forces strive to break through Russian defensive lines.
The deployment of ATACMS, Taurus cruise missiles, and other extended-range missiles would enable Ukraine to strike targets throughout the entirety of the Ukrainian territory under Russian control, including Crimea, as demonstrated by the successful attack on Sevastopol. Russian supply lines, airfields, and command centers in occupied areas would become vulnerable in ways they have not been before.
Military analysts estimate that ATACMS could be a "game-changer" for the counteroffensive, allowing Ukraine to interdict Russian resupply efforts and force Russia to move its logistics hubs further from the front — reducing the tempo of Russian operations and creating opportunities for Ukrainian breakthroughs.
As Ukraine's counteroffensive continues into the fall and winter, inclement weather presents additional challenges. Drenching rain and icy cold can hinder military operations, dissolving roads, and impeding essential activities. The risk is that a breakthrough achieved during this period might be challenging to exploit due to muddy or snowy terrain — a phenomenon known in military history as "rasputitsa" (mud season).
Nonetheless, Ukrainian forces are determined to continue their efforts, focusing on creating fissures in Russian defenses that they can widen and utilize for armored equipment advancement. The window for favorable fighting conditions is limited, with an estimated 30 to 45 days of fighting weather left before conditions turn against Ukraine. Consequently, the transition from attacking to holding ground and protecting civilian infrastructure during winter is anticipated toward the end of October.
This timeline adds urgency to the ATACMS decision. If the missiles are not delivered soon, their impact may be delayed until the spring of 2024, giving Russia time to reinforce its defenses and potentially launch its own winter offensive.
In the ongoing conflict, drones have played a pivotal role, assisting Ukrainian ground forces by providing real-time intelligence. Drones are an integral part of front-line operations, offering constant reconnaissance and surveillance, even for low-level soldiers. Russian troops have also rapidly integrated drones into their battlefield operations, contributing to the slower pace of Ukraine's counteroffensive.
Ukraine has become a proving ground for drone warfare, with both sides using thousands of FPV (first-person view) drones daily for reconnaissance and attack missions. Ukraine's domestic drone industry has grown rapidly, producing long-range strike drones capable of reaching Moscow. Electronic warfare has become as important as artillery, with both sides jamming each other's signals and seeking technological advantages.
The combination of drones, artillery, and long-range missiles — including ATACMS — would create a comprehensive battlefield picture, allowing Ukraine to detect, target, and destroy Russian positions with unprecedented precision. But the clock is ticking.
Despite the challenges posed by evolving tactics and weather conditions, Ukraine's determination to advance remains unwavering. The focus now is on making progress before adverse weather conditions further complicate the situation, with both sides experienced in adapting to changing circumstances and maintaining their operational effectiveness. The coming weeks will determine whether Western allies — particularly the United States — will provide the long-range firepower Ukraine needs to break through Russian lines before winter arrives.
Related Coverage: For more on US military aid to Ukraine, visit U.S. Commits $250 Million Military Aid and Russia-Ukraine War: Recent Escalations Analysis.
Global Post Headline — independent coverage of US foreign policy and the Russia-Ukraine war. globalpostheadline.com | Follow updates: War News | US News